Share

Tobacco Control

ACS CAN supports a comprehensive approach to reducing tobacco use and exposure to secondhand smoke, including increasing taxes on all tobacco products, implementing comprehensive smoke-free laws, fully funding and sustaining evidence-based, statewide tobacco control programs, ensuring access to clinical cessation services and working with the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco products and their marketing.

Tobacco Control Resources:

ACS CAN and its partner organizations submit these comments in response to the advance notice of proposed rulemaking issued by the Food and Drug Administration urging the FDA to commence a rulemaking proceeding to propose, and ultimately to adopt, a product standard that will prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes.

The tobacco control partners submit a Citizen's Petition to the FDA request the prohibition of menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes.

  •  

Regulation and Products Resources:

The undersigned organizations submit these comments in the above-designated docket concerning FDA’s draft guidance titled “Enforcement Policy for Certain Marketed Tobacco Products” (the “Draft Guidance”). The proposed policy would protect the financial interests of everyone in the supply chain at the expense of the health of the consumer. 

The undersigned public health organizations submit these comments on the above-listed tobacco product modified risk applications submitted for the IQOS heated tobacco product system. The subject applications should be denied for the reasons detailed in these comments.

ACS CAN appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) on our shared priority of reducing death and disease caused by tobacco use.

The organizations signed below want to express as clearly as possible our views about what will be necessary to address e-cigarettes. We believe that FDA’s actions must address three core principles and that to be effective FDA needs to take action in four specific areas.

We write to bring to your attention numerous apparent violations of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act) and the FDA’s deeming rule prohibiting the marketing, without a marketing order from FDA, of electronic cigarette products that were not commercially marketed as of August 8, 2016.

In its final Deeming Rule, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made the appropriate determination that there is no public health justification for exempting so-called “premium cigars” from the Rule. No data or other information has emerged since the final Rule was issued in May, 2016 that should cause FDA to reconsider that conclusion.

In order to protect kids from these products, FDA should publish a proposed, and then final, rule prohibiting characterizing flavors in all combusted and smokeless tobacco products as soon as possible.

On behalf of the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) draft concept paper on ‘Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products After Implementation of a Food and Drug Administration Product Standard.’

The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has published and sought comments on a draft paper entitled Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products after Implementation of an FDA Product Standard. The document addresses the potential for development of an illicit market as a result of a number of different potential product standards, including but not limited to, those that would (1) impose a maximum level of nicotine in cigarettes and other combusted tobacco products at levels that would be insufficient to sustain nicotine addiction; and (2) prohibit the use of menthol in cigarettes and prohibit the use of characterizing flavors in other tobacco products.

Smoke Free Resources:

Secondhand smoke (SHS) is an occupational hazard for many casino workers- from dealers to security. Job-related exposure to SHS is a significant, but entirely preventable, cause of premature death among U.S. workers.

More than 40 years after former U.S. Surgeon General Jesse Steinfeld first exposed the potential health risks of secondhand smoke (SHS) in 1971,1 and nearly 30 years after a subsequent Surgeon General’s report stated that SHS causes lung cancer and other diseases,2 all U.S.

Secondhand smoke is a serious health hazard. Ventilation technologies do not sufficiently protect individuals from the harmful effects of breathing in secondhand smoke.The only effective way to fully protect nonsmokers from exposure to secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking in indoor public spaces.

ACS CAN advocates for comprehensive smoke-free laws in all workplaces to protect workers and the public from the harmful effects of secondhand exposure and to create communities that support tobacco-free living. 

Prevention and Cessation Resources:

This joint statement from a consortium of public health organizations sets forth aspirational principles to help local and state health departments, decisionmakers, advocates, and other stakeholders advance equitable enforcement practices related to the purchase, possession, sale, and distribution of all tobacco products. These principles can also help address tobacco addiction and reduce tobacco-related harms while maintaining and improving the efficacy of enforcement of commercial tobacco laws and policies.

The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) is pleased to submit comments on the request for information concerning advancing tobacco control practices to prevent initiation of tobacco use among youth and young adults, eliminate exposure to secondhand smoke, and identifying the eliminating tobacco-related disparities.

  •  

Tobacco Taxes Resources:

Increasing tobacco excise taxes is one of the best ways to reduce overall tobacco use. It is important that when considering an excise tax increase on any tobacco product, including e-cigarettes, that the tax should be increased on all tobacco products at an equivalent rate to encourage people to quit rather than switch to a cheaper product, and prevent youth from starting to use any tobacco product.

 

When faced with mounting evidence that tobacco tax increases effectively reduce tobacco use, tobacco manufacturers will try to distract policymakers from the material facts by invoking dire warnings of reduced revenue due to increased illicit activity including widespread smuggling and other organized crime that they claim will result from increased taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products.

The economic model developed jointly by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (TFK), the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), and Tobacconomics (a program of the University of Illinois at Chicago) projects the increase in state revenues, public health benefits, and health care cost savings resulting from increases in state cigarette tax rates.  The projections are updated annually.  Calculations are based on economic modeling by Frank Chaloupka, Ph.D., and John Tauras, Ph.D., at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Jidong Huang, Ph.D., at Georgia State University, and Michael Pesko, Ph.D., at the University of Missouri.

The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) supports a comprehensive approach to tobacco control that includes significantly increasing excise taxes on all tobacco products to generate revenue, protect kids, and save lives. Significant tobacco tax increases are one of the most effective ways to prevent kids from starting to use tobacco and help adults quit.

The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) supports a comprehensive approach to tobacco control that includes significantly increasing excise taxes on all forms of tobacco. Regular, significant excise tax increases of $1.00 or more per pack of cigarettes are one of the most effective ways to prevent kids from starting to use cigarettes and to help adults quit. Tobacco excise taxes can also reduce tobacco-related health disparities among people with limited incomes, pregnant persons and among racial and ethnic populations.

 

Tobacco excise taxes benefit people with limited incomes and reduce tobacco-related health disparities, especially when tobacco excise tax revenues are dedicated to cessation programs that serve people with limited incomes.